Is Card Counting Illegal?

It is the first question almost everyone asks about the subject, and the honest answer has three parts, because the question hides three different ones. Is counting a crime? Generally no. Can a casino throw you out for it? In most places, yes. Is using a device to do it a crime? In some jurisdictions, very much so, and that is the part people get wrong.

Counting in your head is not a crime

There is no federal statute in the United States that makes card counting an offense, and no state has criminalized the act of remembering which cards have been dealt and adjusting your play accordingly. That is worth sitting with for a moment, because the folklore around the subject implies otherwise. What a counter does is pay attention and do arithmetic. Neither is illegal, and a rule against them would be unenforceable in any event.

The technique itself is public knowledge and has been since Edward O. Thorp published Beat the Dealer in 1962, which laid out the first widely known counting system and turned an obscure mathematical result into a mass-market book. Sixty years of published literature later, the method is taught openly. Nothing about how counting works is secret or prohibited.

Devices are a different legal category entirely

This is the distinction that matters, and it is the one most often blurred. Counting with your mind is one thing. Counting with a machine is another, and several gaming jurisdictions treat the second as a serious offense.

Nevada is the clearest example. Its statute NRS 465.075 makes it unlawful for a person to use, or to possess with intent to use, any computerized, electronic, electrical or mechanical device, or any software or hardware, designed or programmed to obtain an advantage at playing a game in a licensed gaming establishment. The statute then names the kinds of device it means, and the list is precisely aimed at counters: devices that project the outcome of the game, that keep track of cards played or prepared for play, that analyze the probability of an event in the game, or that analyze the strategy for playing or betting. Only equipment approved as part of the game itself is exempt.

Read that list carefully. A concealed computer is obviously covered. So is a phone running counting software at the table, and so is a signaling device shared between team members. This is not an ejection-and-a-stern-word situation; it is a criminal statute, and Nevada treats violations as a felony.

Other jurisdictions have their own device provisions, worded differently, and they change over time. If your interest in the subject goes beyond the theoretical, the applicable statute in your jurisdiction is the thing to read, not an article on the internet.

The practical rule is simple and has no edge cases: counting software belongs in practice, never at a table. That is the only context in which 21 Trainer's counting drills exist.

21 TrainerCounting drills built for practice at home. Virtual chips only, no real money anywhere in the app. Get the app

Casinos are private businesses, and that is the real constraint

The consequence a counter actually faces is not criminal. It is commercial. Casinos in most of the United States are private property, and operators may decline to offer a particular game to a particular customer. In practice that takes graduated forms: shuffling the shoe early when your bets rise, restricting you to flat bets, asking you to play something other than blackjack, or asking you to leave the property and not return.

None of that requires proving anything. A business declining to take a customer's action is not an accusation of wrongdoing, and the countermeasures that come before an outright exclusion are usually quiet.

New Jersey is the well-known exception. In 1982 the New Jersey Supreme Court decided Uston v. Resorts International Hotel, holding that the state's Casino Control Act gives the Casino Control Commission exclusive authority to set the rules and methods of play for licensed casino games. Because that authority sits with the Commission rather than the operator, the casino could not exclude Kenneth Uston on its own for counting. The court did not rule that excluding counters would be unlawful if the Commission chose to allow it, only that the casino could not decide the question unilaterally. New Jersey casinos still use countermeasures within the rules, such as shuffling and betting restrictions.

What is actually illegal at a blackjack table

Since the question usually comes bundled with a general worry about what crosses a line, it is worth naming the things that genuinely do. Marking cards, in any way. Manipulating a bet after seeing the outcome, which is called past posting. Colluding with a dealer. Using the devices described above. Claiming a payout you did not earn. All of these are ordinary fraud or theft, and they have nothing in common with counting except that they happen at the same table.

Counting differs from every item on that list in one respect: it uses only information that every player at the table can see. The cards are dealt face up in most games. A counter is doing something with public information that the casino would prefer nobody bothered to do.

The expectations problem

Legal does not mean lucrative, and this is where honest writing on the subject usually stops short. Even a technically flawless counter faces a set of realities that no amount of skill removes.

• The edge is small. Counting shifts the odds by a fraction of a percent under good conditions, and only across a very large number of hands.
• The variance around that edge is large. Long losing stretches are routine even when the mathematics is on your side, which is what our article on risk of ruin exists to quantify.
• Conditions have to cooperate. Deep penetration, a decent bet spread and reasonable rules are prerequisites, not luxuries.
• Continuous shuffling machines return discards to the shoe continuously, which keeps composition near neutral and makes counting ineffective. A table with one is simply not a counting game.
• Casinos watch for it, and the countermeasures above are cheap for them to apply.

None of this makes the subject less interesting. It makes it a skill rather than a plan. The people who enjoy counting tend to enjoy it the way people enjoy any demanding mental discipline, and they are clear-eyed about what it does and does not produce.

Where that leaves you

If you want to learn to count, learn it. It is legal to know, legal to practice, and legal to use with nothing but your own head. Get basic strategy automatic first, then pick a system, Hi-Lo being the usual starting point, and drill it somewhere with no money involved.

Keep the two rules that carry actual consequences: no devices at a table, ever, and no expectation that a small mathematical edge is a reliable source of anything. Everything else about the subject is just an interesting problem in applied probability.

Practice the legal wayFour counting systems with drills for tags, true count, bet spreads and deviations. No account, works offline. Download